Know Thy History: Prince Valiant

There must be something in the waters of Nova Scotia that makes its residents really embrace history. Kate Beaton, one of the most prominent names in webcomics currently, made it big by sticking modern slang in the mouths of respected figureheads of history.

She’s not the only one, though. Once upon a time, a resident of Halifax became a staff artist for the venerable retailer, Hudson’s Bay Company, in Winnipeg, where he drew ads for ladies’ corests. Later, he would move to comic strips. His first job was illustrating the adventures of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan. However, being a true artist, what he really wanted to do was work on something that was his own creation.

Newspaper tycoon William Randolph Hearst loved this man’s pitch so much that he offered him ownership of the strip, a rarity for the earlier work-for-hire era in comics. Incidentally, this is the third time Hearst factors into this feature. It’s kinda uplifting to know that one of the world’s biggest media tycoons was deep down inside a huge comic nerd.

That cartoonist went on to pen the adventures of a knight in King Arthur’s Court, someone whose adventures are still featured in newspapers to this day. His name was Hal Foster, and that comic strip is Prince Valiant.

(Incidentally, this piece is going to lack the usual links, mainly because my main reference site for newspaper comics — the I Love Comix Archive — went down because the hosts got spooked by SOPA. Sigh.)

Continue reading

Know Thy History: Phantom Lady

There’s been quite a bit of talk lately about the role of female characters in modern superhero comics. Marvel got criticized lately for citing low sales as the reason for culling all their comics featuring superheroines. Over at the Distinguished Competition, DC got several fans riled up for their overly-slutty renditions of Starfire and Catwoman. Some of the criticisms I agree with (I am definitely not a fan of the sexy new Amanda Waller in Suicide Squad), some I’m OK with (on the other hand, skimpily dressed Harley Quinn is OK with me).

It’s a tender, tender subject that, at the end of the day, devolves into hard feelings, cruel name calling, and buckloads of tears.

Scantily clad dames, though, have always been an issue in comics. And, believe it or not, it’s not Wonder Woman’s fault, despite the character being created by bondage-lover William Marston. Between the 1940′s and 1950′s, there was a trend to put a sexy gal on the cover to drive up sales. It was known as “good girl art.” Here’s how Richard Lupoff (by way of Wikipedia) defines it:

A cover illustration depicting an attractive young woman, usually in skimpy or form-fitting clothing, and designed for erotic stimulation. The term does not apply to the morality of the “good girl”, who is often a gun moll, tough cookie or wicked temptress.

Comics and magazines were adorned with the images of sensuous ladies, who may or may not have anything to do with the stories contained within. Quite a bit of the imagery contained bondage or damsel-in-distress situations. Many predated Wonder Woman. Bill Ward created Torchy for Army newspapers; she’d soon transition to comic books and newspaper strips. Over at Harvey Comics, the original Black Cat was vamping up the comic pages in a skimpy black swimsuit.

The one that reached the greatest notoriety, though, was a sparsely attired gal known as Phantom Lady.


Continue reading

Holy LetterCols, Batman!

Aside

Huh! While I was out taking care of my sick ma, it seems that one of the Q&A’s I sent to ComicsAlliance got answered when I wasn’t looking. It was answered by the venerable Chris Sims (author of the recently reviewed Awesome Hospital). Here was my question:

Q: There have been some theories that Azrael was a parody of the X-tremeness of Image Comics heroes at the time. I’m not sure, since at the time it looked like DC Comics was committed to putting out a new generation of heroes to catch on with younger readers at the time (a la Kyle Rayner). So what do you think? Was AzBats a parody, or was he a legit Batman replacement that never really caught on? — Larry, via email

That “Larry” would be me, if y’all were wondering. Finding it published in the “Ask Chris” article made me feel as giddy as Geoff Johns did when he was but a young nerd spinning far-too-elaborate theories about the Green Lantern.

So what was the verdict on AzBats? The answer may surprise you.

Or not.

However, it is incredibly in depth and for that I thank Mr. Sims for taking the time to answer it to the fullest extent of his abilities. It’s not just about AzBats, but an exploration of the superhero phenomenon of the 90′s. Here’s an excerpt:

After all, the whole story of Knightfall and Azrael kicked off in 1992, during a time when comics were absolutely dominated by characters of the Badass Killer variety. Wolverine, Cable, the original bunch over at Image, hell, the Punisher was supporting three ongoing monthly comics, and as much as I love that guy, I’m pretty sure it wasn’t his compelling origin or character development that made him so popular. It was the fact that he was a ruthless killer. Same goes for Wolverine: Claremont, Byrne, Cockrum and Miller may have made him a surprisingly rich, deceptively complex character, but the reason most people were reading those comics was because he had knives sticking out of his hands that he used to stab ninjas. Believe me, as a kid who was ten years old in 1992, I can totally confirm that this is a premise with huge appeal.

And comics fans being what they were, they wanted everything to be like that. Well, I say “comics fans,” but that’s not really fair — fans of all media tend to be like that. Doom’s great and becomes a huge success, so we get a ton of first-person shooters that are variations and improvements. Street Fighter has kids lining up around the block, so Tekken and Mortal Kombat and Virtua Fighter become the main attraction at the arcades. Grand Theft Auto 3 is revolutionary and phenomenal, so suddenly everything’s got to have an open world sandbox.

It’s required reading for fans of comics history and people wondering why ever hero in the 90′s had those friggin’ pouches.

(On another side note, I’m halfway to finishing my next review, so The Webcomic Overlook should be back in business some time soon.)

Know Thy History: The Addams Family

It seems like movie and TV studios are running out of ideas nowadays, doesn’t it? They’re desperately trying to find a new vein of creativity. The surprising thing is that some question inspirations end up paying off.

The most famous recent example would be the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. I mean, back when it first made light, everyone — and I mean everyone — was clucking their tongues, laughing at how creatively bankrupt Hollywood had become. “A movie based on a Disney ride?” the pop culture wags would say. “How droll! What next: a movie based on Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots? Oh, to see the day when that happens.”

But, as well all know, Pirates was a humongous success, kickstarting a three sequels, the current obsession with pirates, and a whole industry of Jack Sparrow Halloween costumes. It also sorta got it into some Hollywood producer’s minds that, “Hey, if a Disney ride could be a movie, ANYTHING is fair game! Does anyone have the rights to that Milton Bradley Battleship game? Get Liam Neeson on the phone!”

I mean, what next? What if you got really obscure. Like you tried to adapt a loosely connected series of cartoons that were featured in famously high-brow magazine The New Yorker. They’re just vignettes: the characters don’t have names, and the series doesn’t even have a title. How crazy and kooky would that be?

Well, as you guessed from the title of this “Know Thy History,” that’s exactly what happened when Charles Addams gave the world The Addams Family.

Continue reading

Know Thy History: The Red Bee – bonus round

The Red Bee’s questionable attire gets him a lot of crap. His stripey tights and transparent blouses makes him to the poster boy of terrible superhero design. And, make no mistake, it IS eye-searingly bad. However, the surprising thing about reading Hit Comics, the home of The Red Bee, is that he was hardly the worst dressed out of the heroes featured within. Hit Comics was a horror house of fashion nightmares.

Don’t believe me? Observe:

Check out the look on the pilot’s face as he’s attacked by the hero Hercules. You can tell he’s all, “Oh … crap. How am I going to explain to the guys back at HQ that I got attacked by a pervert wearing a cape, underpants, and nothing else?” Look, when even pro-wrestlers are dressed more modestly than you, you’re in desperate need of an emergency make-over.

Let me just say, Stormy Foster, that I love the pencil-thin moustache. It’s a facial hair statement that gets so little respect nowadays, especially since Deadshot seems to no longer be sporting his fantastic ‘stache in the pages of Suicide Squad. That said: your costume consists of what can be accurately described as a pair of tighty whities.

Why are there so many ass shots?!?!?

We’re… we’re going on some kind of sex offender registry for viewing Lion Boy, aren’t we?

On the other hand…

Look at this suave mofo. Don Glory is everything you want in a Champion of Democracy … and more. He’s the dude you want to have delivering punches … punches of FREEDOM.

Know Thy History: The Red Bee

DC Comics’ New 52 initiative has brought several long forgotten heroes back from ignominy. Animal Man and Swamp Thing were rescued from the dustbins of Vertigo past. Grifter and Voodoo were deemed to be the least bland of the WildCATs and were granted their own titles. Frankenstein, Harley Quinn, and The Demon were rescued from second-banana heaven and are the headliners for team-based titles.

And yet, I must ask: wither The Red Bee?

The Red Bee debuted in Quality’s Hit Comics #1 way back in July 1940. He was created by Audrey Anthony “Toni” Blum (one of the few female comic creators in a male-dominated industry) and Charles Nicholas (who I think was really Chuck Cuidera … I’m not totally sure because apparently three different comic creators used that pseudonym, including JACK friggin’ KIRBY).

The Red Bee’s secret identity was Rick Raleigh, assistant to district attorney Tom Darrow. He hailed from Superior City, Oregon, which, despite its lofty (vaguely northern Michigander) name was a hive of scum and villainy. He’d seen far too much crime and corruption slip through the courts.


Continue reading

Technology, comics, and you

Aside

Tom Pappalardo, cartoonist behind The Optimist and Broken Lines, put together a humorous piece about how modern technology — while very convenient — makes cartooning so much harder. From his humorous (yet true) piece “How Steve Jobs Ruined Comics“:

Cartooning is, to me, an art form of simplification. The artist uses a minimal amount of lines to communicate characters and place to a reader. Mouths are often oddly-shaped black holes. Cartoon evolution often does away with lips, body hair, elbows. Eyebrows are reduced to lines. Eyes become dots. A background might be a line indicating where the floor and wall meet. Maybe a squiggle of distant trees, or a cloud. Maybe just a flat field of color. Cartooning is also about communicating an idea in the briefest terms possible. It is literally a shorthand form of storytelling. If you’re making a comic strip, and that joke takes place in a restaurant and the setting is important to the joke or narrative, you damn well better explain that as quickly as possible in the first frame so you can get on with what you’ve got to say. In short, in cartooning things need to be made apparent.

In many ways, technology—especially consumer-driven technology—has been striving for the same thing as cartoonists for years now. Simpler, smaller, more streamlined. Minimalist. Removing as much of the object as possible, leaving only the key components (in technology’s case, the interface, the screen). Steve Jobs led the way for elegant and simple device design, and it’s a beautiful thing. But a cartoonist might reach a point where representing something in a super-simplified style when the object itself is already super-simplified becomes increasingly difficult.

People interacting with multi-purpose devices aren’t doing anything, at least nothing particularly visual. They are sitting or standing, moving their eyes, maybe tapping the screen, maybe swiping. They might be doing something crucially important to the narrative of the story you’re trying to tell, or the joke you’re trying to set up, but in appearance they’re just… standin’ there. It forces the storyteller to drop a big dialogue hint to clue the reader in, like:

“Hi! I was just calling to leave you a message…”
or
“This Bluetooth headset is so comfortable I barely notice it!”
or maybe
“My, this is a wonderful video I am viewing on my portable media playback device!”

As interfaces with technology continue to become smaller, thinner, less obtrusive, less noticeable, and less identifiable visually, creative artists will have to continue to adapt and improve their visual communication skills. I look forward to seeing these forward-thinking solutions to these incredibly important challenges, so I can steal them. HA-HA! Some day soon even the small electronic devices will disappear, and this tyranny of the black rectangle will come to an end, leaving visual storytellers in an even more challenging environment: A world of people laughing, talking, and staring off into the middle distance as their neural implants amuse, entertain, and sell them things. That will make drawing stories about them very exciting, indeed.

Check into his site for the rest, which includes some fun illustrations.

(h/t ComicsAlliance)