I don’t know what review you read, but I certainly didn’t see it as being an internet troll’s attempt at butthurt fame.You seem convinced that it is and it really isn’t. If he wanted that, it would have been a lot easier to go to the comic’s website, post shitty comments on the forum with a link to his blog attached and just wait for the angry fans to roll in and up his viewer counter.

Also, to essentially say that insulting/not liking someone’s particular art style is a “low blow” seems stupid to me. It would be like me saying “Wow, Dali sure knows what he’s doing with those elephants, while Degas’ work over here just looks like a blob of water color to me!” and then having someone telling me I can’t have that opinion because “It’s insulting the artist”. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, now does it?

TL;DR: I am a big fan of the comic and even I think you’re being a dipshit.

Jack is the furry webcomic equivalent of “Naked Lunch” and ya’ll know it! XD

Say what you will about David’s cosmology and ethics, he is one thing you have to respect: completely, brutally, and nakedly honest about the way he feels and the way he sees the world.

Without a doubt, it is utterly repugnant to the masses, but the only way we are going to make progress in our culture (and you’re an idiot if you claim we don’t need any) is with this kind of openness.

That’s how I see it, anyway.

And you read all of it.

Dang, man. My heart goes out to you.