<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metapost: Roger Ebert on the Five-Star Rating System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/</link>
	<description>Webcomic reviews are serious business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptJ</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/#comment-9083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaptJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 04:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=1199#comment-9083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never heard of a 7-star system. I tried using a 10-star system. It was too hard. I don&#039;t know when to give 10 stars because it is like calling it perfect then I realized that there is no point of 10th star if I never used it. I guess that I haven read enough books to use the 10-star system.

Is it a matter of experience or preference?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never heard of a 7-star system. I tried using a 10-star system. It was too hard. I don&#8217;t know when to give 10 stars because it is like calling it perfect then I realized that there is no point of 10th star if I never used it. I guess that I haven read enough books to use the 10-star system.</p>
<p>Is it a matter of experience or preference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Santo</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Santo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=1199#comment-817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, here&#039;s my take on things: I avoid halves.  I don&#039;t give out half ratings, and the above little man explanation explains why.

Doing halves effectively makes the system a 10-star rating system.

At least when I took courses on public polling, the best system is considered a 3-point system (which signifies &quot;No,&quot; &quot;Indifferent,&quot; and &quot;Yes&quot;).  The next best would be 5.  And then 7, and so on.

Ebert is right on the money when the question on most people&#039;s minds just boils down to &quot;Well, did you like it or not?&quot;

When you start going from 4 to 4.5, you start to mentally rank comics on preference.  Such as, &quot;Well, I gave McNinja a 4.5, and Pibgorn a 4.  I like Joe Loves Crappy Movies more than Pibgorn and less than McNinja.  Do I give it a 4.25?&quot;  And you just can&#039;t do it that way.  The decimals are just too hard to keep track of.

Ratings are bunk, anyway.  There&#039;s 2,000+ words of opinion already out there to tell ya what I really think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s my take on things: I avoid halves.  I don&#8217;t give out half ratings, and the above little man explanation explains why.</p>
<p>Doing halves effectively makes the system a 10-star rating system.</p>
<p>At least when I took courses on public polling, the best system is considered a 3-point system (which signifies &#8220;No,&#8221; &#8220;Indifferent,&#8221; and &#8220;Yes&#8221;).  The next best would be 5.  And then 7, and so on.</p>
<p>Ebert is right on the money when the question on most people&#8217;s minds just boils down to &#8220;Well, did you like it or not?&#8221;</p>
<p>When you start going from 4 to 4.5, you start to mentally rank comics on preference.  Such as, &#8220;Well, I gave McNinja a 4.5, and Pibgorn a 4.  I like Joe Loves Crappy Movies more than Pibgorn and less than McNinja.  Do I give it a 4.25?&#8221;  And you just can&#8217;t do it that way.  The decimals are just too hard to keep track of.</p>
<p>Ratings are bunk, anyway.  There&#8217;s 2,000+ words of opinion already out there to tell ya what I really think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delos</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=1199#comment-815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting indeed.

I have been working on a variant of Mike&#039;s (mpd57) hat system for my own star-rating purposes. I was thinking it might offer a more subjective take on comics but... it may just be that I&#039;d like to avoid the middle road and maybes, since that&#039;s what I see a lot of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting indeed.</p>
<p>I have been working on a variant of Mike&#8217;s (mpd57) hat system for my own star-rating purposes. I was thinking it might offer a more subjective take on comics but&#8230; it may just be that I&#8217;d like to avoid the middle road and maybes, since that&#8217;s what I see a lot of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bengo</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bengo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=1199#comment-813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever notice ratings are the most useful at the extremes? Which is a way of saying YES! or NO! The MAYBEs are hard to parse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever notice ratings are the most useful at the extremes? Which is a way of saying YES! or NO! The MAYBEs are hard to parse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sly Eagle</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/09/15/metapost-roger-ebert-on-the-five-star-rating-system/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sly Eagle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=1199#comment-812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting thought. If I ever get around to doing my own review site, maybe I&#039;ll draw little comic-me icons that show my response to the comic instead of stars (or cookies, or flaming arrows, or whatever.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting thought. If I ever get around to doing my own review site, maybe I&#8217;ll draw little comic-me icons that show my response to the comic instead of stars (or cookies, or flaming arrows, or whatever.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

