<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scott Kurtz vs. Webcomic Reviewers and the Democratic Response!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/</link>
	<description>Webcomic reviews are serious business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Nihilist Asks: Why do negative reviews? &#171; The Webcomic Overlook</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captain Nihilist Asks: Why do negative reviews? &#171; The Webcomic Overlook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-1132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] good critique is something that I don&#8217;t mind touching upon from time to time. Previous posts attracted the attention of my fellow webcomic critics, and there&#8217;s nothing I like more than hanging around with our [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good critique is something that I don&#8217;t mind touching upon from time to time. Previous posts attracted the attention of my fellow webcomic critics, and there&#8217;s nothing I like more than hanging around with our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gigcast - Your Webcomics Podcast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Webcomic Wire - 8/19/08</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gigcast - Your Webcomics Podcast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Webcomic Wire - 8/19/08]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Webcomic Overlook has something to say about Scott Kurts’ posts regarding webcomic review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Webcomic Overlook has something to say about Scott Kurts’ posts regarding webcomic review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Santo</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Santo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Scott Kurtz comes off as rude sometimes because he writes almost exactly as he talks, and the listener often gets a much more favorable impression than the reader.  For example, Scott said very similar things on the Webcomic Weekly podcast a few weeks ago (this time, regarding criticism that he and his Half Pixel pals give to aspiring readers).  There he comes off as more pleasant.  I think it may be because his voice sounds more relaxed, more jovial.  However, if those very same words were transcribed for online reading, it would come off nearly as &quot;rude&quot; as his controversial blog post.

Kurtz suffers from some sort of crazy reverse-Nixon syndrome. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Scott Kurtz comes off as rude sometimes because he writes almost exactly as he talks, and the listener often gets a much more favorable impression than the reader.  For example, Scott said very similar things on the Webcomic Weekly podcast a few weeks ago (this time, regarding criticism that he and his Half Pixel pals give to aspiring readers).  There he comes off as more pleasant.  I think it may be because his voice sounds more relaxed, more jovial.  However, if those very same words were transcribed for online reading, it would come off nearly as &#8220;rude&#8221; as his controversial blog post.</p>
<p>Kurtz suffers from some sort of crazy reverse-Nixon syndrome. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delos</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice comment on the Comixtalk article (and a great avatar, too.)

Kurtz has a right to his Peer Principle. It&#039;s a shame that he has to be shortsighted about the wide variety of places to get good feedback. It would also be nice if he could do it without being rude.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice comment on the Comixtalk article (and a great avatar, too.)</p>
<p>Kurtz has a right to his Peer Principle. It&#8217;s a shame that he has to be shortsighted about the wide variety of places to get good feedback. It would also be nice if he could do it without being rude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strip News 8-15-08 &#124; ArtPatient.com</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strip News 8-15-08 &#124; ArtPatient.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mr. Scott Kurtz of PVP comic fame. I received some feedback as well as some nice complements from El Santo and Bengo from The Floating Lightbulb. It is also revealing to read Kurt&#8217;s followup comments [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Scott Kurtz of PVP comic fame. I received some feedback as well as some nice complements from El Santo and Bengo from The Floating Lightbulb. It is also revealing to read Kurt&#8217;s followup comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movie Comic</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Movie Comic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great analysis of the situation.  I think the important thing for creators to remember is that critics are offering their opinions, but a critic is also a representative of his own core audience.  Readers stick to critics they agree with, and critics can become an imporant tool in guiding readers to good undiscovered work, or steering them away from the bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis of the situation.  I think the important thing for creators to remember is that critics are offering their opinions, but a critic is also a representative of his own core audience.  Readers stick to critics they agree with, and critics can become an imporant tool in guiding readers to good undiscovered work, or steering them away from the bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for writing this.  I was starting to feel like I was the only one who was actually with Scott on this one!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for writing this.  I was starting to feel like I was the only one who was actually with Scott on this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Rowntree</title>
		<link>http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/08/11/scott-kurtz-vs-webcomic-reviewers-and-the-democratic-response/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winston Rowntree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcomicoverlook.wordpress.com/?p=832#comment-697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;So if an artist or writer comes away with something valuable from some of my reviews, then great! I’m glad for you! But the truth is that it’s probably something that, deep down inside, you knew you had to improve all along.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Exactly. But maybe that something would have stayed deep down if it hadn&#039;t been pointed out in a review. Because sometimes that&#039;s what it takes, and thus reviews can be an integral part of the artist&#039;s growth. I&#039;m not pro-critic or anything, but good advice is good advice no matter where it comes from--simple as that. And often a critic will be the only one to stand up and tell the artist he/she has no clothes, and so, potentially at least, the critics have their role because we artists need to know when we&#039;re naked. There are universal truths regarding any art form, and the Artist is not always aware of them. Ignore the source, and delve for good advice. Ignoring all critics is just pointlessly bullish and full-on ignorant, and this is coming from someone who dislikes critics as much as anyone. The progression of one&#039;s work should come from truth, and no man is a ready-made island of truth. When people tell me &quot;your comics have too many words,&quot; I know it&#039;s subjective and I ignore it (ain&#039;t no cap on words). When they say &quot;the pop culture references are tired,&quot; I know they&#039;re right because they ARE tired (it&#039;s been done, so I ought to stop doing it if I want to stand out). Simple. Either it&#039;s true or it isn&#039;t. What IS a critic? A person with opinions. Should the artist ignore people with opinions? Obviously not. Avoid a void: develop an ear for truth and you can learn from anyone. This is not to overstate the importance of critics, this is merely to say that sometimes they&#039;re right, and when they&#039;re right they&#039;re right.

Oh, and I always thought the Prime Directive was a dumbass rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So if an artist or writer comes away with something valuable from some of my reviews, then great! I’m glad for you! But the truth is that it’s probably something that, deep down inside, you knew you had to improve all along.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly. But maybe that something would have stayed deep down if it hadn&#8217;t been pointed out in a review. Because sometimes that&#8217;s what it takes, and thus reviews can be an integral part of the artist&#8217;s growth. I&#8217;m not pro-critic or anything, but good advice is good advice no matter where it comes from&#8211;simple as that. And often a critic will be the only one to stand up and tell the artist he/she has no clothes, and so, potentially at least, the critics have their role because we artists need to know when we&#8217;re naked. There are universal truths regarding any art form, and the Artist is not always aware of them. Ignore the source, and delve for good advice. Ignoring all critics is just pointlessly bullish and full-on ignorant, and this is coming from someone who dislikes critics as much as anyone. The progression of one&#8217;s work should come from truth, and no man is a ready-made island of truth. When people tell me &#8220;your comics have too many words,&#8221; I know it&#8217;s subjective and I ignore it (ain&#8217;t no cap on words). When they say &#8220;the pop culture references are tired,&#8221; I know they&#8217;re right because they ARE tired (it&#8217;s been done, so I ought to stop doing it if I want to stand out). Simple. Either it&#8217;s true or it isn&#8217;t. What IS a critic? A person with opinions. Should the artist ignore people with opinions? Obviously not. Avoid a void: develop an ear for truth and you can learn from anyone. This is not to overstate the importance of critics, this is merely to say that sometimes they&#8217;re right, and when they&#8217;re right they&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>Oh, and I always thought the Prime Directive was a dumbass rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

